- #New screen late 2013 imac pro
- #New screen late 2013 imac Pc
- #New screen late 2013 imac plus
- #New screen late 2013 imac mac
Whether we ever get there depends on just how aggressive Intel is on the graphics front. If Apple could shift most of its designs exclusively to processor graphics, it would actually be able to realize board and power savings which would have an impact on industrial design.
#New screen late 2013 imac plus
Plus there’s the whole believing in the strategy aspect of all of this.
#New screen late 2013 imac pro
I suspect Iris Pro probably came in a bit slower than even Apple expected, but given that Apple asked Intel to build the thing it probably felt a bit compelled to use it somewhere. With NVIDIA you can get better performance, while Intel should deliver somewhat lower power consumption and an obvious reduction in board area. The two end up being fairly similar in cost (with Intel getting the slight edge it seems).
#New screen late 2013 imac Pc
Most PC OEMs appear to have gone the opposite route - choosing NVIDIA’s low-end discrete graphics over Intel’s Iris Pro. Apple’s engineers aren’t particularly fond of performance regressions, so the NVIDIA GPUs stick around for those who need them, and for the first time we get a truly decent integrated option from Intel. As we found in our preview of Intel’s Iris Pro 5200, in its fastest implementation the GPU isn’t enough to outperform NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 650M (found in the 2012 15-inch rMBP). It’s the same bifurcation that I expect to find on the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display. This year, the entry level 21.5-inch model gets Iris Pro 5200 while the rest feature updated NVIDIA Kepler discrete GPUs. In last year’s iMacs, Apple picked from a selection of NVIDIA discrete GPUs. The Iris Pro 5200 is a GPU configuration option I expect to see on the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display, and its presence on the iMac tells us how it’ll be done. The combination of the two gives you a new brand: Intel’s Iris Pro 5200. Not only do you get Intel’s fastest GPU configuration (40 EUs running at up to 1.15GHz), but you also get 128MB of on-package eDRAM. The R at the end of the SKU connotes something very special.
I’d see some excursions up at 3.1GHz but for the most part you’re effectively buying a 3GHz Haswell system. In practice I pretty much always saw the cores running at 3.0GHz regardless of workload. That’s four cores running at 2.7GHz, and capable of hitting up to 3.2GHz. At $1499 Apple will typically sell you a dual-core notebook of some sort, but here you get no less than a quad-core, 65W Core i5-4570R. The entry level 21.5-inch iMac is one of the most affordable options in Apple’s lineup. The CPU: Haswell with an Optional Crystalwell As tempted as I was to begin my first look at the 2013 iMac evaluating the impact of going to faster storage, it was the entry-level model that grabbed my attention first because of a little piece of silicon we’ve come to know as Crystalwell. Displays and resolutions are the same, but silicon options are a bit quicker, 802.11ac is on deck and the SSDs all move to PCIe (including Fusion Drive). This year the iMacs get incrementally better. Yeesh, I never thought I’d do either of those things.Ĥ x USB 3.0, 2 x Thunderbolt, 1 x GigE, SDXC reader, headphone jack
So today’s confession is really a two-parter: I’ve been using an iMac for the past year, and I’ve been using a hard drive as a part of my primary storage for the past year. I’m happy to report that it actually did.
Obviously Apple’s Fusion Drive is designed to mitigate the inevitable performance degradation, and my initial take on it after about a month of use was very good - but would it last? When the OS is a clean install, the drive is mostly empty and thus operating at its peak performance. It’s entirely possible to mask the overwhelmingly bad experience of a hard drive in a high performance machine by only sampling at the beginning of the journey. This past year has been the most insane in terms of travel, so it wasn’t a lack of mobility that kept me on the iMac but rather a desire to test Apple’s new Fusion Drive over the long haul.
#New screen late 2013 imac mac
I always said that if I had a less mobile lifestyle the iMac is probably the machine I’d end up with (that was prior to the announcement of the new Mac Pro of course). For the past year I’ve been using a 27-inch iMac as my primary workstation.
0 kommentar(er)
